NEO-DARWINISM CANNOT EXPLAIN MAN’S DISTINCTION FROM ANIMALS

The Biblical text was not intended as a precise scientific document, but it does describe essential facts that Man needs to know, including the two phases of Man’s creation.

The Biblical text was not intended as a precise scientific document, but it does describe essential facts that Man needs to know, including the two phases of Man’s creation.

These phases correspond to the scientific evidence we have.

Phase I:

“And God formed the man of dust from the ground, and he blew into his nostrils the soul of life, and man became a living being”

(Genesis 2:7)

The term “living being” used in Genesis 2:7 is the same term used in Genesis chapter 1 to describe the animals that God created before Man.

The great rabbinic sage Sforno explains that in phase I primitive Man existed as a higher form of animal, but still an animal similar to all the other animals which are lacking the ability of speech and intellectual reasoning.

We might conclude from this that these animal like humans could have existed for hundreds of thousands of years, but they left no evidence of language, writing, civilization, or abstract thought.

Line drawings on a cave wall, with no evidence of language or abstract thought, do not really distinguish primitive Man from animals.

Phase II:

“God planted a Garden in Eden, to the East, and placed there Man whom He had formed.” (Genesis 2:8)

The rabbinic sage Sforno explains that the “Garden” is the location where Man received the “image of God” so that higher Man gained the ability for speech and intellectual reasoning that primitive Man and animals are lacking.

This second phase would have occurred less than 6000 years from the present time, IE in the year 5786 according to the Jewish calendar that counts from the creation of higher Man.

Honest scientists will admit that the oldest writing that exists is less than 6000 years old, which was the period when Man was placed in the “Garden” and received the “image of God”.

No amount of Darwinist imagination can explain Man’s ability for speech, language, writing, and intellectual reasoning. These abilities could only be granted by a supernatural Creator.

God’s Mind is Far Above Man’s Puny Mind

Could all the Neo-Darwinist scientists in the world construct even a one-celled living organism from (non-living) laboratory chemicals? I rather doubt it.


Could anything as enormously complex as a 1 celled organism have evolved from un-directed natural causes?

https://www.britannica.com/science/cell-biology

How could the cell nucleus survive before all the other components evolved?

How could the components outside the nucleus survive before the nucleus evolved?

We should have the humility to admit that God’s mind is far above Man’s puny mind.

In contrast, the pompous and intellectually dishonest New Atheists and Neo-Darwinists refuse to admit that they have no explanation for the origin of the Universe, nor can the Neo-Darwinists explain the origin of life on Earth. 

At best Neo-Darwinist theories can explain minor changes within the same species (such as the size and shape of a finch’s beak) due to un-directed natural causes. These changes do not represent any increase in the complexity of the species.

The many articles and books by Dr. Stephen Meyer teach true science within the limits of Man’s knowledge.

“the probability of producing even a single functional protein (a gene product) of modest length (150 amino acids) by chance alone stands at a “vanishingly small” 1 chance in 10^164 (10 to the 164 power)”