ANTI-ZIONISM-A-DECEPTIVE-FACADE

“Anti-Zionism” is a very fake facade used to conceal one’s Jew hatred and vehement opposition to Biblical values. These Biblical values clearly indicate that God gave the Land of Israel to the Jewish nation.

The term “anti-Zionism” is a misleading straw man argument causing both Jews and Christians to fall into an intellectual trap.

The term Zionism only refers to a secular political movement that had originally developed from a Biblical world view that Jews own the Land of Israel and they must settle it.

The real issue that is the root of the Middle East conflict today is whether one’s world view is a Biblical world view or an Islamo-Marxist-White-Supremacist world view.

Woke Left and Woke Right propagandists indoctrinate many well meaning but gullible people to believe that the conflict in the Middle East is simply about “Zionism” or “Anti-Zionism”.

“Anti-Zionism” is a very fake facade used to conceal one’s vehement Jew hatred and opposition to Biblical values. Biblical values clearly indicate that God gave the Land of Israel to the Jewish nation.

No one is demanding that pro-Zionist activists, Christian or otherwise, become disloyal to America or become mouth pieces for the policies of the Israeli government.

Jewish and non-Jewish “anti-Zionists” pretend that they are “America First” and opposed to alleged policies of the Israeli government. In truth their opposition has nothing to do with the policies of the Israeli government.

The real conflict in the Middle East is about the Muslim jihadists and woke Left and woke right activists fighting furiously against Biblical values and against the existence of the Jewish nation.

When viewed in this light, one cannot be a Jewish “Anti-Zionist” nor can they be a Christian “Anti-Zionist”, because those viewpoints are really anti-Biblical viewpoints.

Those Jewish and non-Jewish propagandists hiding behind a facade of “anti-Zionism” should be more correctly described as “Anti-Biblical”.

NEO-DARWINISM CANNOT EXPLAIN MAN’S DISTINCTION FROM ANIMALS

The Biblical text was not intended as a precise scientific document, but it does describe essential facts that Man needs to know, including the two phases of Man’s creation.

The Biblical text was not intended as a precise scientific document, but it does describe essential facts that Man needs to know, including the two phases of Man’s creation.

These phases correspond to the scientific evidence we have.

Phase I:

“And God formed the man of dust from the ground, and he blew into his nostrils the soul of life, and man became a living being”

(Genesis 2:7)

The term “living being” used in Genesis 2:7 is the same term used in Genesis chapter 1 to describe the animals that God created before Man.

The great rabbinic sage Sforno explains that in phase I primitive Man existed as a higher form of animal, but still an animal similar to all the other animals which are lacking the ability of speech and intellectual reasoning.

We might conclude from this that these animal like humans could have existed for hundreds of thousands of years, but they left no evidence of language, writing, civilization, or abstract thought.

Line drawings on a cave wall, with no evidence of language or abstract thought, do not really distinguish primitive Man from animals.

Phase II:

“God planted a Garden in Eden, to the East, and placed there Man whom He had formed.” (Genesis 2:8)

The rabbinic sage Sforno explains that the “Garden” is the location where Man received the “image of God” so that higher Man gained the ability for speech and intellectual reasoning that primitive Man and animals are lacking.

This second phase would have occurred less than 6000 years from the present time, IE in the year 5786 according to the Jewish calendar that counts from the creation of higher Man.

Honest scientists will admit that the oldest writing that exists is less than 6000 years old, which was the period when Man was placed in the “Garden” and received the “image of God”.

No amount of Darwinist imagination can explain Man’s ability for speech, language, writing, and intellectual reasoning. These abilities could only be granted by a supernatural Creator.

ISLAM IS IDOLATRY

“Allah” is not the God that the Jews worship. The Torah considers “Allah” as meenoot (IE intellectual idolatry).

“After Hashem, your God, shall you walk and Him shall you fear, His commandments shall you observe, and to His voice shall you hearken, Him shall you serve, and to Him shall you cleave.” (Deut. 13:5)

“But not new commandments devised by a prophet” (Commentary by rabbinic sage Sforno on Deut. 13:5)

Jews should not be hoodwinked into believing that Muslims pray to the same god that Jews pray to.

“Allah” is the false god of Islam. “Allah” is NOT Hashem, the god of the Jewish Bible whom Jews are supposed to serve.

“Allah” is not the God that the Jews worship. The Torah considers “Allah” as meenoot (IE intellectual idolatry) according to a senior Hareidi rabbi I consulted.

Belief in the Islamic deity “allah” is belief in a deity that has radically different attributes than Hashem, the God of the Bible.

Islam teaches that “allah” has attributes such as hearing, seeing, and speech, and “allah” claims that the Jews altered and distorted the Torah.

According to Muslims, “allah” rejects the Jewish Torah as having been forged by the Jews, and “allah” calls for the slaughter of Jews. How can “allah” possibly be the God of the Jews?

Many teachings of the Islamic Quran violate the Seven Noahide commandments that all non-Jews are required to accept according to the Jewish Bible. For example, Islam brutally violates the Noahide prohibition of murder and prohibition of theft, among other commandments.

In fact Islam, as an invented religion, is considered avodah zarah by many Torah authorities, even IF Muslims do not worship idols.

Avodah zarah”, translated as FOREIGN worship, does not mean only worshiping an idol, avodah zarah includes inventing a new religion such as Islam.

Non-Jews are not allowed to invent a new religion, especially a new religion that attacks the Torah as false, which Islam certainly does.

The Rambam and many Jews might have been killed if he had spoken honestly about Islam, so he had to remain neutral.

Because Christians accept at least some of the principles of the Jewish Bible, they are actually closer to Judaism than Islam.